Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | _dztf's commentslogin

If you stick to standards, it should work on Firefox. How nice it would be if some other browsers also played by the rules coughchromecough


I switched to FF when Quantum came out and have not looked back. Chrome is bloatware. Plus using it is just encouraging its mission to obliterate any semblance of browser standards.


I've been in this industry for over 15 years. I don't have a single certification. I learnt everything by reading and doing. With your method, I would still know nothing.


Tinfoil Hat = paranoid, as in people who believe govt is sending mind control waves, and wear tinfoil hats so as to block them.


I like Chrome, it is my go-to browser as a user. As a developer, though, I hate how it spits on the face of standards, like not expiring cookies when the HTTP response says, and instead turning them into session cookies instead.


file a bug - https://new.crbug.com or is there an existing one?


http://www.treklightgear.com/treklife/hammock-angle/ ... skip to where it talks about the angle.


That's some website, forcing me to enable javascript so I can use their "totally necessary" custom scrollbar </getoffmylawn>

Anyway, that's interesting. Thanks!


Neat! There really is interesting stuff to learn about everything.


EDIT: Just saw this is from 2001, so may be a tad bit justified in the MS context. I still stand by the "goes against the community spirit" thing though.

Doesn't this sort of closed-mindedness fly in the face of the spirit of FOSS and community? Plus, today's MS is not the evil empire of yesterday. I'd rather be in bed with them than, say, Oracle. Long time Java hating .NET guy here- so I am probably biased though.



This is so Black Mirror.


I get your point, but I do have to point out that the title is misleading in that it mentions that "the internet crushed Clinton's book" but does not quite mention "how".


Good riddance?


Betteridge's law definitely applies here.

e: Strange that my post would get net downvotes in addition to its parent post which it obviously very much disagrees with. Almost as though a person would downvote a post, whose meaning depends entirely on what another thing means (Betteridge's law in this case), without knowing what that thing means? Or perhaps without reading carefully enough to know what the fuck my post is even saying?

(Seriously, to whoever downvoted me: if you think I'm in agreement with aashishkoirala, go outside or grab a coffee or take a nap or something - you're not thinking clearly.)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: