Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bddbbd's commentslogin

> Many people have been exposed to a lot of far UVC and nothing bad has happened to them. > > Looking right at it might not be good for your eyes. > > I feel confident for myself that far UVC is safe.

This is dangerous misinformation. Like any toxic, it's the Dosis that kills

There are very powerful far UVC products available which will give you sunburn on your skin in a couple of seconds

Somebody blasting UVC in a room of people is crypto monkey level of stupid


The person who blasted the crypto people with UV was not using far UVC.

Lots of "toxic" things are beneficial for public health. I'm sure you could poison yourself with soap but we put it in every bathroom.

Like with soap, it does not seem plausible that you could unintentionally harm yourself with far UVC lights.


I don't quite get what the language means by being pure object oriented since it seems to support varinle assignment and thus side effects?


it means there are objects, everything is an object. That has nothing to do with side-effects.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: