It probably is perl or Python.

It gives me a pleasure satisfactory that just comes from reading about how a person formulates their reading list.

They will directly write that "Radiologists miss nearly one-third of breast cancers."

I trust the meaning of this article is just that it requires hospitals to rethink their decision to substitute all doctors today.

No hospital is deciding that. People have been testing whether we can replace radiologists with AI for over 10 years.

If they test someone with no background in radiology, they could even make the headline "Humans miss 50% of breast cancers"

I wouldn't miss any of them. "Idk what I'm looking at but click positive and let someone who does sort it out this is way too dangerous".

AI doesn't have that option yet.

- I cloned a project from GitHub and made some minor modifications.

- I used AI-assisted programming to create a project.

Even if the content is identical, or if the AI is smart enough to replicate the project by itself, the latter can be included on a CV.

I think I would prefer the former if I were reviewing a CV. It at least tells me they understood the code well enough to know where to make their minor tweaks. (I've spent hours reading through a repo to know where to insert/comment out a line to suit my needs.) The second tells me nothing.

Its odd you don't apply the same analysis to each. The latter certainly can provide a similar trail indicating knowledge of the use case and necessary parameters to achieve it. And certainly the former doesnt preclude llm interlocking.

Why do you write like that?

It would help if I had a better understanding of what you mean by "that".

I generally write to liberate my consciousness from isolation. When doing so in a public forum I am generally doing so in response to an assertion. When responding to an assertion I am generally attempting to understand the framing which produced the assertion.

I suppose you may also be speaking to the voice which is emergent. I am not very well read, so you may find my style unconventional or sloppy. I generally try not to labor too much in this regard and hope this will develop as I continue to write.

I am receptive to any feedback you have for me.

Do people really see a CV and read "computer mommy made me a program" and think it's impressive

Unfortunately, it is happening. I remember an old post on HNs, it mentioned that a "prompt engineer for article generating" can find more jobs than a columnist writer. And op just wrote articles by himself but declared that all artices were generated by AI.

I'd quickly trash your application if I see you just vibe coded some bullshit app. Developing is about working smart, and its not smart to ask AI to code stuff that already exists, its in fact wasteful.

A CV for the disappearing job market as you shovel money into a oligarchy.

But you have ability to suffer painful for a long time.

If you think that’s ability then you should see what my whole life has been. Pain from exercise is a joke in comparison.

Maybe this is because humans have good intuition to know the difference between us. But this type of intuition does not work on the behaviour of LLMs.

Today, I trust the other meaning of "fake images" is that an image was generated by AI.

Sometimes they do all the operations by themselves. Finally, this is a race about who can find a scientist to design the best "research project" for their kids.

Maybe the most benefits are from the condition that people can read another new paper with enough background knowledge.

If patients are lawyers, doctors, or engineers, this system will still work for them.