Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | otikik's commentslogin

To me it means “I didn’t want to come up with an intelligible syntax for this”. Shell scripts have many dark corners and sharp edges like this is one.

Free trailer

I'm sort of curious where the law stands on this (I am not a lawyer).

Since it has a license plate on it, it in theory displays some ownership info. Is that enough for me to say, "it's clearly not mine now"? If it didn't, does that give me any right to take something off a public roadway?

Obviously, I know that the letter of the law, and what actually will be enforced, are two different things. Taking something that belongs to CBP would almost definitely be prosecuted in this case, regardless of whether it's legally fair game to do so.

It appears that I can't direct-link to it, but look up case 19S-CR-00528 on public.courts.in.gov - this was a case in which the Supreme Court of Indiana overturned an earlier ruling that removing a GPS monitoring device from your own car, when you weren't aware it was there, was theft.


Free SIM card, free NUC running the ALPR DSP software, free Victron solar battery charger/power supply equipment…

"Don't worry, we have Gemini looking at this very issue right now for all teams"

"I know, I'm reading along!"

Waymo is worth nothing if there’s congestion. That’s the problem public transportation solves, not lack of connectivity

> Experts say the move signals the Trump administration is reverting to a more confrontational approach

Oh. So, like, going from school bully to abusive parent?


> Adapt or die.

Yeah, no. That's not how government works - thankfully. I don't want my water to stop flowing just because someone decided to be drastic about software changes.

I agree with you in that all governments should be using open source software, for the record.

But governments are big machines and you can't steer them like a sports car. In some cases, the massive inertia they have can even be a good thing - a crazy guy can't just be elected one day, start issuing presidential mandates, and then expect them to happen immediately, for example.


Space exploration needs things to be better. Better propulsors. Better seals. Better materials. Or else the space capsule explodes and people die.

What the article is proposing is making programming worse, for no apparent benefit for anyone except those who sell AI data center cycles.


Why would I want to do that?

I am learning rust myself and one of the things I definetly didn't want to do was let Claude write all the code. But I needed guidance.

I decided to create a Claude skill called "teach". When I enable it, Claude never writes any code. It just gives me hints - progressively more detailed if I am stuck. Then it reviews what I write.

I am finding it very satisfying to work this way - Rust in particular is a language where there's little space to "wing it". Most language features are interlaced with each other and having an LLM supporting me helps a lot. "Let's not declare a type for this right now, we would have to deal with several lifetime issues, let's add a note to the plan and revisit this later".


FYI: Claude has output styles, one of them is called `learning`. Instead of writing the code itself, it will add `TODO(human)` and comments to explain how to. Also adds `Insights` explaining concepts to you in its output.

This link also has a comparison to Skills further down.

https://code.claude.com/docs/en/output-styles#built-in-outpu...


Isn’t it more like the referee being for sale? He who pays more scores more goals

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: