I think the script would be named as `#` so that it can be called via `\# mycmd` instead of `\\# mycmd`.

Unless you disable cursor blinking because you find it annoying (like I do).

Yeah, disabling cursor blinking is the first configuration I do in any terminal.

Node 24+ does respect HTTP_PROXY when NODE_USE_ENV_PROXY=1 is set.

Node v22.21+ as well

> GitHub’s contributor graphs use mailmap.

This is not true, .mailmap is [unfortunately] not supported by GitHub: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/22518

Do you have an example of this in mind where the known "tit for tat" strategy falls short?

I don't have a concrete example, but I think you can invent plenty of iterated prisoner's dilemmas with whatever modified rules and variables and find 'tit-for-tat' isn't the end-all-be-all. Like it changes things if there's an infinite or an unknown number of rounds, some of the defects are 'noise', etc.,.

Linux is not developed in GitHub.

I know it's only a mirror, but it looks like an approval

You don't seem to get the point. That is only universal in current day English. In e.g. Finnish: miljoona = 1e6, miljardi = 1e9, biljoona = 1e12, triljoona = 1e18.

What's your suggested alternative?

In our internal system we use it "as-is" as an autocomplete system; query/lead into terms directly and see how it continues and what it associates with the lead you gave.

Also visualise the actual associative strength of each token generated to confer how "sure" the model is.

LLMs alone aren't the way to AGI or an individual you can talk to in natural language. They're a very good lossy compression over a dataset that you can query for associations.

It's essentially <insert god of your choice>

Even if the meaningful content would have been older than yours, faking Git timestamps is trivial.