Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | smilespray's commentslogin

Keep in mind Apple would never admit mistakes on Liquid Glass. But: Looks to me they're fixing some of the worst aspects. I'm on the fence.

The iOS 7 flat redesign was a UX disaster. But they got back up to speed in subsequent releases.

There IS something to be said for design resets with follow-up refits to accomodate for actual human beings. Most companies just add crap on top of crap.

Not saying what everything Apple does is perfect, even as a user/fanboy since '86.

What I most enjoyed about todays's annoucement that they're doing a Snow Leopard performance/bug reset, because that was expected and needed. And they started out with it, so they know their WWDC audience.

So: Both a technical and UX debt effort, with some privacy-focused AI on top.

I can't complain.


Interesting thought. Isn't it possible to design around this?

Surely this was considered when building the first modules.


Of course you can, but "needs to survive 26+ years" was very likely not part of the original design goals. The designers of the time probably wouldn't have expected the dysfunction to be so deep that 26 years later, only the Chinese can seem to stick to a plan.

You can design around a lot of stuff but what you encounter in orbit will ultimately laugh at that bandage and eat it away. AtOx, hard UV, and radiation levels you don't get on Earth just have their way with everything in orbit over time.

You don't get the AtOx going to mars but you have everything else which will utterly take its toll on a traveling craft.


AKA Salami Tactics, famously referred to in the UK sitcom "Yes, Prime Minister"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salami_slicing_tactics


Isn't the whole five eyes argument moot because member states spy on citizens from the other countries and trade intel with each other?

No need for that charade if you are a foreigner, even from NATO ally.

Think about it the other way: It's an opportunity to talk about lookup tables, loop unrolling and tricks like that.

Also, now different people are pitching in with their own takes, so it turned into a bit of friendly competition.


Maybe it's because he's a bit of a gun nut on the side? He did some computer videos casually carrying a rifle of some kind slung over his shoulder.

I still enjoy his videos.


A lot of vintage restorers don't like him and people like him because he goes Wow! Look at This! and then suddenly a bunch of middle aged men with beards have that exact thing on their shelf. And those of us doing preservation and restoration suddenly are priced out of the hobby we've been in for decades.

Also, his technical "work" is not great. In fact, it's really bad. Even his successful fixes show a lack of attention to detail.

It's worth noting that he started his career as a computer scrapper.


The attention thing he can't be blamed for, and it's in any case a mixed blessing (more popularity of a specific retro computer can also have upsides for the existing enthusiasts).

He's definitively not the best hardware restorer. But his historical videos, his games and his X16 project are pretty nice.


Yeah, I've seen some fixes that gave me the wrong kind of goosebumps.

I like his history videos, though, for instance the ones that talk about graphics modes for a given computer.

Also, your bio says you don't shave. Sure you're not one of those bearded, middle-aged men?


I also live in my mom's basement and write currency libraries.

>currency libraries

Are there some hidden depths to formatting/converting that I'm missing? And yes. I know not to use floats


Currency conversions is a fantastically more complicated task than most people realize. Also, performing transforms.

Most of his restoration work on videos limited to just being cosmetic at best with his expertise just being retrobriting.

When there was an issue on the motherboard, he almost always outsourced to his more tech-savy friends to fix it for him.


Gun nut is fine. One can be a gun nut without supporting the awful ideas/people within that domain. It's the support of awful ideas/people in that domain them that make him "controversial" (a.k.a. anti-social asshole, that insist being an anti-social asshole is simply a personality trait, immune to criticism)

Nah these days you pick a team and cancel the other.

Yeah, the teams are "The Assholes", and "Everyone Else". The problem with assholes is they don't "cancel" the other team, they forcefully insist on being part of the other teams lives.

I find it funny that being Texan == gun nut. But I'm from Oregon, lots of OreGUNians around here.

This should be the default behavior.

Microsoft deliberately chose not to because keeping your files in the cloud is a barrier to easy switching.


Probably because the 1TB of storage you get with Microsoft 365 (or whatever it is called now) for <$100/year is more space than most computers come with.

I’ve had OneDrive for a very long time, and there was a couple of years where they didn’t have the files on demand feature as they rewrote the OneDrive client. It was a major regression for me.

If you don’t like that behavior, you can always just check the box to sync everything. I do that on my machine that has 2TB of storage.


How to kill a business 101. The brand damage to business and owner is incalculable.

I now use both. DynIP for public-facing services (yeah I still have a few), and Tailscale for what only I need to access. Drastically reduced my attack surface.

Luckily I don't have to deal with CGNAT.


This makes me really happy, like really really. It is the exact part of the /guide where things work together and not agaist or replace, synergy and happiness.

Reminds me to put Tautulli on Tailscale now. Just reviewed my port openings.

I also write my own copy. (You're absolutely right!) But this trend on HN of calling out everything as AI slop is a bit tiring.

Reading so much of it on HN is presumably equally as tiring.

I think the problem is that half the time the callouts are incorrect (edgelords trying to be clever) or irrelevant (non-native speakers using AI to translate or clarify).

Sustained pushback helps define how the tool is used, and if it only takes a few years of complaints to permanently establish good social norms around it, I think we're better for it. At least, I much prefer this than a world where everyone is too polite to complain about slop until slop is all that is left..

I agree. However, it's gotten so bad that people are calling out AI slop on things they just don't care for — or mistake human writing for AI — which paradoxically becomes its own red flag to ignore the comment, even if there are valid points within.

I just used the em dash twice, and have been doing so for 35 years. This is now supposedly a dead give-away for slop.

Call it slop when it's slop. When it's not total garbage, give it a rest.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: