Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sonotathrowaway's commentslogin

Next time you wonder why a Trump supporter has a bad argument, remind yourself there was a nonzero number of them who literally drank bleach and Lysol after he told them too.


I like how you're being downvoted for pointing out an objective, documented fact. [1]

Of course an important corollary is that Trump did not, in fact, tell anyone to drink bleach or Lysol. His supporters were stupid enough to do it on their own initiative, at Trump's mere suggestion that it was worth looking into.

1: https://www.poison.med.wayne.edu/updates-content/kstytapp2qf...


You mean like how the Houthi’s unilaterally decided to shut down Red Sea shipping and the US Navy is still powerless to restore it?


That's regional politics. Nothing to do with the superiority of one navy over another


The dollar being the reserve currency is international finance. Nothing to do with the superiority of one navy over another.


What? The Houthis shutting down a major global shipping route and the US openly giving up on restoring it is not "regional politics."


Navies appear to be obsolete (edit: I'll exempt ballistic missile subs from this statement, though.) You don't even need a navy of your own to sink another country's navy these days.

When $100M in armaments can take out a $10000M carrier, it's time to rethink things.


One of the implications of having the worst education in the nation is that a lot of facts would surprise them.


Genuinely believing that only one person in America dies in a home invasion is hard to take seriously.

I imagine most preteens in America have a better grasp of reality than the one you’re espousing here.


I just checked UK stats and from my reading of ONS's homicide data it's entirely possible it's around zero from burglary gone wrong.

The us is only 5 times bigger


IIRC hand guns are slightly harder to obtain in the UK. And also slightly less legal for civilians to own.


Can you let Obama know Libya wasn't his fault and he bears absolutely no responsibility? He seems to be living in that alternate reality - you'd think he would be a better judge of what reality existed, but alas not everyone is as observant as you. Surely the US cannot be held responsible for any action of NATO, they have no relation with that organization at all.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/apr/12/barack-obama...

While you're there you should also let Hilary Clinton know that she wasn't a war hawk either, and the no-fly zone just spontaneously appeared with no US involvement at all.


You’re an ms-13 member, actually.


Their comment is vastly more substantiated than your feelings are. We all know that NYT suppressed a story about unlawful mass surveillance, then published it to avoid being scooped.

This is besides the mountains of bullshit they pushed to promote the Iraq war - propaganda they have never, and will never fully admit to.


I genuinely don’t know which country you believe has checks and balances.


Instead of reading about how “terrible” the US system is, I encourage readers to listen to what historians say about autocratic regimes and to see whether these things still apply today.

One difference for example is that in the West, it is allowed to criticize your own government. In autocratic regimes on the other hand it might cause you to “retire” early.


Yes, censorship incidents like the red scare, Hollywood blackballing, and outright assassinations (hi Fred Hampton) would definitely never happen in the United States.

That’s why Bush illegally wiretapping every American citizen was excusable - Bush would never retaliate against critics, like trying to kill Valerie Plame for exposing his lies.


Guantanamo has big fat checks and balances.


It's gotta be the one with an unelected billionaire installing spyware in all government administrations.


This is after they had been caught wiretapping every citizen in the country, with controls so loose that analysts could use it to stalk their exes.


Right, its safer to have private capital police state.


<citation needed>


So you’re admitting that the call was real, we should just ignore it because it’s inconvenient to your beliefs?


You shouldn't ignore it, you should listen carefully, and you should ponder why an enemy state wants it to outrage you.


They know their argument is bolstered by the truth being widely known in this case, so it benefits them to leak it.

Why is it so important to you that the truth is suppressed?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: