The account that posted this comment seems to be a bot account - and one that doesn't even read the article in it's context.

Agreed, half of these questions are answered in the post. Also, looking at the account's comment history confirms that it's karma-farming with comments or something like that

One thing that annoys me about LLMs is how they say stuff that's dumb but sounds smart. For example:

> Have you considered adding historical tracking/graphing? Being able to see throttling patterns over time would be super valuable for understanding workload impacts and diagnosing thermal issues

Would it actually though? Is anyone going to ever check if their laptop was throttling at 6pm yesterday evening and then remember what they were found at that time and try to "understand workload impacts"? It's the type of thing that might come in kinda useful once in a while, not "super valuable". Idk, I notice this trend with LLMs a lot. Often what they say just doesn't really make sense when you think about it.

This comment deflects from the very real original comment's gripe with not linking to the original source.

You have to view it from a new investor's perspective. They have just started their career, earning (small amounts of) money for the first time, and investing would have them see a loss of 5-10% of their hard earned money, at least in the short term. They wouldn't know, or would have to believe that the loss will be outweighed by future returns at the time.

It's tough to swallow.