I understand how people take offense at this. However I am saying that their offense is misplaced and the call for action validates the censorship of womens sexual desires.
I think you understand this, we just sit wanting different things. To my mind you are calling for the censorship of mens sexual desires to match.
In regards to finding a better way for the author to have said it, I imagine simply replacing 'women' with sex would be both more explicit and absent of trigger words.
the call for action validates the censorship of womens
sexual desires
How does asking people to be more sensitive validate the censorship of women's sexual desires? I think that's overthinking it.
Women are an underprivileged group right now, and nobody's "calling for censorship." I'm just asking for kindness. Is there anything wrong in hoping that people can be more kind?
There are many offensive things we avoid saying in general. It's not new, and it's not different to ask that people respect one another.
I think you understand this, we just sit wanting different things. To my mind you are calling for the censorship of mens sexual desires to match.
In regards to finding a better way for the author to have said it, I imagine simply replacing 'women' with sex would be both more explicit and absent of trigger words.