Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Which is absolutely wrong. They're deciding, as a contractor, to not take jobs which are not worth their time. As a contractor, they're supposed to be able to do that without punishment. If Uber is doing this, it is a punishment.


> punishment

There's some balance between punishment and keeping the rider experience pleasant. I don't want to wait 10 minutes to get matched because of nearby lurking Uber Black cars passing on my Uber X request.

If a driver ignores several requests in a row, they're clearly taking a break. It's a feature, not a punishment.


> don't want to wait 10 minutes to get matched because of nearby lurking Uber Black cars passing on my Uber X request.

Uber has a solution in place to deal with this, and it's surge pricing.


I wonder if surge is activated by a lack of drivers or a lack of drivers who accept rides. My initial thought was that it was based on the number of active drivers, so making a driver inactive would take the pricing higher for the remaining drivers.


No, that's not clear. And if you don't like that you can't get a ride in time, switch to another network.


> switch to another network

My point exactly. That's neither in the interest of the driver nor the company.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: