Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Interestingly, cash would seem to be a security under this definition. Except it is explicitly exempted:

> The term ‘‘security’’ means any note, stock, treasury stock, security future, security-based swap, bond, debenture, certificate of interest or participation in any profit-sharing agreement or in any oil, gas, or other mineral royalty or lease, any collateral-trust certificate, preorganization certificate or subscription, transferable share, investment contract, voting-trust certificate, certificate of deposit for a security, any put, call, straddle, option, or privilege on any security, certificate of deposit, or group or index of securities (including any interest therein or based on the value thereof), or any put, call, straddle, option, or privilege entered into on a national securities exchange relating to foreign currency, or in general, any instrument commonly known as a ‘‘security’’; or any certificate of interest or participation in, temporary or interim certificate for, receipt for, or warrant or right to subscribe to or purchase, any of the foregoing; but shall not include currency or any note, draft, bill of exchange, or banker’s acceptance which has a maturity at the time of issuance of not exceeding nine months, exclusive of days of grace, or any renewal thereof the maturity of which is likewise limited.

From The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (N.B. IANAL).

So, will cryptocurrencies, possibly including ICOs, be exempted? Only history will tell.



Nobody is saying that crytocurrencies 'in general' are going to be declared securities.

This is about ICOs. IE, a tokens that are a 'FUTURE' promise for something that doesn't exist yet.

If Bitcoin was a security, the statement from the SEC head would be very different.


> Nobody is saying that crytocurrencies 'in general' are going to be declared securities.

I agree with you, but the fact is plenty of people do. Maybe not in the corner of the world, but look broader. This also wasn't the point.


We'll probably need better criteria for what's actually a proper crypto 'currency' vs 'security' vs whatever else first.


Pretty sure the SEC already commented saying they consider Bitcoin to be an asset rather then a currency?


I wonder if you were to declare an intent to establish a new nation in the Antarctic (say by purchasing some of Chile's land) and to fund raise for fees associated with this new nation you offered to sell people dollars of your soon-to-be currency at some fixed price below the expected value, would the SEC disapprove of such an action?

(assuming it was actually done in good faith and not discernibly a scam)


The SEC would not have any jurisdiction there.


If you're doing the fund-raising in the US, they would absolutely have jurisdiction.


To clarify, yes, this is with the assumption you're actively fundraising in the US. And even if your entity is not based in the US, the question would be for the US related portion of your entity.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: