Which main "Smalltalk" are you thinking of when you say "supports multicore since the early days"?
There certainly have been research Smalltalk implementations that do, like:
"Multiprocessor Smalltalk: A Case Study of a Multiprocessor-Based Programming Environment"
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234768128_Multiproc...
and more complete implementations like Actra and Gemstone/S.
Thanks for the paper reference.
As for Gemstone I was aware of it. :)
So you mean ParcPlace Smalltalk-80 "supports multicore since the early days"?
I think those Smalltalk "processes" are run in the same OS thread and only use one core, so please explain what you mean.
Were you aware of Actra?
So from that point I stand corrected, however I would say it was an implementation detail, as the ProcessScheduler could easily have other policies.
There's an enormous chasm between research experiments:
September 1988 "From Objects to Actors: Study of a Limited Symbiosis in Smalltalk-80"
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.41....
:and well-understood techniques supported by all the programming tools.
Which main "Smalltalk" are you thinking of when you say "supports multicore since the early days"?
There certainly have been research Smalltalk implementations that do, like:
"Multiprocessor Smalltalk: A Case Study of a Multiprocessor-Based Programming Environment"
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234768128_Multiproc...
and more complete implementations like Actra and Gemstone/S.