Apparently I was remembering Pedestal. See my other comment.
> Many of the things Om tried are more relevant to things like Redux
> And as a counterpoint, React just introduced the State and Effect Hooks, but those are both things that Om and reagent (the most-used Cljs React lib) have been able to do for years.
These are great evidence for my point, that Clojure has worked as a testing ground for features which more mainstream languages and frameworks then adopted.
I don't think I was clear enough. Yes, React (and others) has adopted things from Clojure/script, but to me, that's a sign you're using inferior tools that are several years behind.
E.g., I used to do a lot of PHP, and my last PHP project was in Laravel, which is heavily influenced by Rails, and PHP 7. Many people touted "Modern PHP is just as good as Python/Ruby/Js!" but missed the point that they'd been using tools with inferior capabilities for years.
Apparently I was remembering Pedestal. See my other comment.
> Many of the things Om tried are more relevant to things like Redux
> And as a counterpoint, React just introduced the State and Effect Hooks, but those are both things that Om and reagent (the most-used Cljs React lib) have been able to do for years.
These are great evidence for my point, that Clojure has worked as a testing ground for features which more mainstream languages and frameworks then adopted.