Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why was it bad? I'm not an audiobook listener so I don't know what's considered bad.


It's an user-experience problem: for an audiobook, Book of Why is quite dense in formula that are hard to visualize when spoke as words.

For example, consider what happens if we try to describe a causal diagram in words

"A points to B, A points to X, B points to Y, and X points to Y. Now, if we apply do(X) to the diagram, we see that we can Y is now no longer a child of..."

or even simple formulas in words:

"P of A given B times P of B is equal to P of B given A times P of A"

For most of us, this sort of deal is hard to "get" and would be much better served if we just looked at a visual diagram or saw the equation.

I personally had to repeat many sections over and over again with a notebook and pencil in hand to truly understand what was being read to me... but if I'm taking notes and creating visuals for myself, then I might as well have just gotten the paper variant of this book lol.


There are a lot of diagrams and a bit of math, which don't naturally translate to a purely auditory experience very well. Having read The Book of Why I can't imagine how it would translate to a reasonable audio-book. Frankly I'm surprised they even released an audio-book version at all.


Audiobooks for dense non-fiction material is usually a bad idea.

I'd recommend audio for fiction, or non-fiction with an engaging storyline (ex: Bad Blood), which this is not.

Nonetheless, I'd still recommend the book.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: