Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> "When you hit a pedestrian with a car, you're in the wrong", it doesn't become more unambiguous than that.

Even if a pedestrian runs out onto a highway and it's physically impossible for you to avoid hitting them?



> Even if a pedestrian runs out onto a highway and it's physically impossible for you to avoid hitting them?

The rule over here is that a driver must always be in control of their vehicle. Exceptional circumstances such as those you describe (which are completely and utterly unlike those of the Uber case) would act as mitigating factor, possibly down to no fault if there was no way for a reasonable driver to avoid the accident.

But the default state of things is that if you decide to put yourself in control of a multi-tons vehicle, you better be able to handle it or the consequences of your recklessness.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: