The post complains that markdown engines render supposedly-the-same-thing in ways different enough to constitute breakage, and that neither engine in question uses a formal grammar to indicate how the language is parsed, making translation between the two very difficult.
The complaint is not actually about any kind of syntax at all -- he mentions that pen and paper is his favorite alternative -- but rather the language's ability to yield consistent and reliable results across different implementations.
The complaint is not actually about any kind of syntax at all -- he mentions that pen and paper is his favorite alternative -- but rather the language's ability to yield consistent and reliable results across different implementations.