Your attempt to crudely quantify something as vague as "superiority" of something as complex as a browser is far more absurd.
> Almost everybody seems to consider chromium in the debate as a proprietary software owned by Google.
For many intents and purposes chromium _is_ proprietary by sheer mass of code, if you don't think so, go and fork it by all means.
> Let's be clear, when you look at the technical, chromium is a far superior browser. Chromium has far more active devs, far more features (look at caniuse.com) and has almost systematically better performance. And it has many others kinds of advantages. All of the stated advantages are sufficent to consider chromium as the best browser.
You have a terribly one dimensional view of browsers, do you still measure your CPU performance in Hz? Browsers are extremely complex, chromium does many things better than FireFox and FireFox does many things better than chrome (even from a purely technical perspective ignoring "user" issues as this one).
Your attempt to crudely quantify something as vague as "superiority" of something as complex as a browser is far more absurd.
> Almost everybody seems to consider chromium in the debate as a proprietary software owned by Google.
For many intents and purposes chromium _is_ proprietary by sheer mass of code, if you don't think so, go and fork it by all means.
> Let's be clear, when you look at the technical, chromium is a far superior browser. Chromium has far more active devs, far more features (look at caniuse.com) and has almost systematically better performance. And it has many others kinds of advantages. All of the stated advantages are sufficent to consider chromium as the best browser.
You have a terribly one dimensional view of browsers, do you still measure your CPU performance in Hz? Browsers are extremely complex, chromium does many things better than FireFox and FireFox does many things better than chrome (even from a purely technical perspective ignoring "user" issues as this one).