Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I absolutely loved Nomad when I used it.

Glad to hear it!

> Unfortunately, as much as I loved the Nomad+Consul combination, I really couldn’t suggest it today.

This is a fair critique and a problem any project living in a world defined by a strong incumbent suffers. You made me realize we need resources to help k8s users translate their existing knowledge to Nomad as many people looking at Nomad will have k8s experience these days.

So thanks for this comment. Maybe with the right docs/resources we can at least minimize the very real cost of using a non-dominant tool.

> But this is all a moot point to me. We are all in on AWS+ECS+Fargate where I work now and we really don’t care about the lock in boogie man.

This was me in a past lives/jobs! HashiCorp's entire product line (with the exception of maybe Packer and Vagrant) become much more compelling for multi-cloud, hybrid-cloud, and on-prem orgs.



In my world, there are two types of “architects” and “consultants”. You have the kind that are “Smart People” (tm) and tell their clients that “this is the way that it should be done” and you have those that “will meet the clients where they are”.

From my experience with Nomad and the little I know about K8s, Nomad is the latter. If you can run it from the command line, you can run it with Nomad. This in and of itself is a great value proposition.

But, Nomad does have the disadvantage, I posted about above and has to fight the “no one ever got fired for buying IBM”. I was able to get buy in only after I told the CTO, “it’s made by the same people who make Consul and Terraform”.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: