Both of those ideas are the sort of bog standard think tank proposals that get trotted out any time somebody points out that one US party has no healthcare plan beyond a quixotic repeal campaign.
> The regular populace has never had this kind of access to political leadership in the history of the planet.
Am I to understand that your contention is twitter has been a positive development for politics in western democracies?
My contention is that twitter has not been only a negative development for politics in western democracies. I don't have a strong opinion about it being a net negative or positive, probably won't be confident about that for at least another decade or two to see how it all settles out.
> The regular populace has never had this kind of access to political leadership in the history of the planet.
Am I to understand that your contention is twitter has been a positive development for politics in western democracies?