Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Yes, but the only suspect does not mean conclusive evidence.

That's... exactly my point. The evidence pointed in favor of human-to-human transmission specifically because there was no definitive common source.

> Li Wenliang said it was SARS

SARS-CoV-2 is literally a different strain of the virus that caused the original SARS (SARS-CoV; now called SARS-CoV-1). "It's SARS" is reasonably accurate (especially given the information available at the time), even if not quite specific; it's like calling Ebola, well, "Ebola" without knowing if it's specifically Zaire ebolavirus or Sudan ebolavirus or Reston ebolavirus or what have you. Regardless, if the public and Chinese authorities had treated it like how said authorities should've treated SARS two decades ago, the world would very likely be in a much better position than it is now. And likewise, if foreign governments (including my own) believed it to be SARS instead of just some weird flu, they might very well have restricted travel earlier and imposed stronger quarantines early instead of waiting until it was too late to be effective.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: