Wow... talk about arrogance! I think you’re unclear about the definition of that word. I’m suggesting that developers have choice in what works for a given project. It’s arrogance to think only your choice is correct.
You’re the type of programmer that tanks projects because of that arrogance and an inability to work with other “meatbags”. Maybe for you it’s all about code perfection, but for the rest of humanity it’s about making a product that works, solves a problem, makes the world a better place, or earns a profit.
Too bad my suckers bet has paid off with success and money. Best of luck with your attitude in life.
Guess these Github meatbags have made a suckers bet on a dynamic language. No way they could be efficient or successful maintaining or refactoring a project of that scale. (Yes that’s sarcasm for the sarcastically impaired)
You’re the type of programmer that tanks projects because of that arrogance and an inability to work with other “meatbags”. Maybe for you it’s all about code perfection, but for the rest of humanity it’s about making a product that works, solves a problem, makes the world a better place, or earns a profit.
Too bad my suckers bet has paid off with success and money. Best of luck with your attitude in life.
Guess these Github meatbags have made a suckers bet on a dynamic language. No way they could be efficient or successful maintaining or refactoring a project of that scale. (Yes that’s sarcasm for the sarcastically impaired)
https://github.blog/2019-09-09-running-github-on-rails-6-0/