Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The article says more about the state of tech blogging than it does GPT-3. I kept thinking "great, another one of these, when are they actually going to show me any results?"

We've been conditioned to accept articles where there's a lot of words and paragraphs and paragraphs of buildup, but nothing actually being said.



Is this meant to be sarcastic?

(For context, the vast majority of the article was generated by GPT-3 itself).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: