Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Frankly, I've seen little evidence that subscription fatigue exists beyond a handful of complains in HN links and comments. The meteoric growth of Onlyfans demonstrates the opposite - that there's huge demand for subscriptions and we're only starting to learn what subscription content folks will pay for.

I suspect that the average person does not sweat every single $5 purchase they make.



The "average person" in the US also couldn't cover a $1000 emergency expense before the pandemic so maybe there's something to this and we shouldn't be encouraging more: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/21/41-percent-of-americans-woul...


Saving $5 here and there is not going to substantially improve emergency savings for the average person. However, it will make their life a little bit less pleasant.

People frequently post on Reddit's personal finance forum saying they have tens of thousands of dollars in debt, they are upside down on their car loan, what can they do? And the first responses are always things like "cancel Netflix". That doesn't really help solve financial problems of that magnitude, it just makes people more miserable.


Well, cigarettes are a $5 subscription of sorts. $5 per week, maybe $5 per day. That could substantially improve a savings fund. Netflix on its own might not, but Netflix, Crunchyroll, and hulu, if you cancel them all that's a couple hundred bucks a year.


> if you cancel them all that's a couple hundred bucks a year

Right, that's what I mean. You go without all those things for a year and all you get is a measly few hundred dollars?

Consider someone on a $15 minimum wage, working 40 hours a week, 2080 hours a year. Their pre-tax income is $31,200. Let's say they cancel subscriptions and save $20 per month, saving $240 per year. That is how much they earn in 16 hours of work -- merely 0.77% of their annual income. I think most people would be ok blowing 0.77% of their income on streaming if they get multiple streaming subscriptions for that money.


I'm with you, but also there isn't really another way. Digging yourself out of poverty is slow, tedious, unglamorous and full of pitfalls which send you back to square one. The alternative is to be content with being poor.

They go without their subscriptions for 4 years and they have their emergency fund. Moreover, after year 1, they can then start buying more of their things in bulk and save the 10% bulk discount on everyday essential items, which can probably give them another 20-30 dollars a month. And then you have to take that time you were spending watching netflix and invest it in learning skills so you can make more than minimum wage.

I struggle with the middle class version of this question all the time. My company pays overtime at about 30/hr after tax. Is it worth it to work on Saturdays or a couple 10-12 hour days through the week in order to collect the overtime? I'll be exhausted and only pick up an extra 150-300 a week. If I do it for a year I can earn an extra 10 grand or so a year and then put it in the stock market where it will pay me $200/year in dividends (and in 45 years I will have replaced my salary).

This is why Naval says you can't trade time for money and get rich the math doesn't work. But in the beginning you have to while you develop the skills and cash reserves so that you can take the risks which can help you build real wealth.


One nuance here is someone making $31,200 is barely getting by. It might only be .77% of their salary, but 50% of their annual savings. The difference between saving $500 and $750 is substantial. E.g. if you’re trying to put together 20k for a down payment, that could be a > 10 year difference in time it takes to get a house.


If you're living that close to using all your salary every month, there are probably better things you can do to save more than cancel Netflix. I think that's what the OP is trying to say.

Netflix is really good value for money. If you want to cancel something, cancel your cable.


I'm with you. People ignore the value these services bring, which at least for the consumer (even when poor) is far outsized what they are paying.


The other thing is that Netflix is cheap. How many activities can one go out and enjoy that are cheaper than Netflix, especially when the weather outside is crap?


There's a hidden opportunity cost of Netflix though: instead of spending 10 hours a week watching Netflix, you could do something much more productive. Netflix is cheap, but it's also pretty much a waste of your time, you're not going to learn anything, and it doesn't satisfy: you always need the next series.

If you quit smoking, you will not just save the money you spent on it, you'll also get more energy, no cravings, and not spend an hour a day smoking. That adds up really quick.


Humans need entertainment, too. Mindless, low-energy entertainment sometimes - especially so when they're already exhausted from work.


I remember a time when I finally got a few hundred dollars in savings. It meant I could write the rent check without counting the days until my next payday.

A "measly few hundred dollars" means nothing to someone making 100K/year. It means everything to someone making 18K per year. Not least of which is the joy and comfort of knowing you actually have some savings.


But how is that worth the sacrifice of not having pleasure in life? Media isn't some purely extraneous feature in life, it's far more important that you're suggesting.


I didn't lack pleasure. I would play volleyball on the beach on Sundays with coworkers, I would borrow books from the library, I would go to parks and gardens. There was always OTA TV as well.


IMO suggestions like "cancel Netflix" are meant to be a little deeper than just "stop spending $16 every month". Binge-watching the same old TV shows is such an easy depression loop to get stuck in :/


This is an argument for UBI, not against the subscription business model.


UBI accoint empties quickly when spending it on fansonly


>when spending it on fansonly

onlyfans?


fansonly is my site. We have one feature.. drain account.

in all seriousness thanks for the correction.


I was under the impression that most subscriptions to OnlyFans were made in a.. less rational state of mind.


That's absurd. Humans do not lose all executive decision making just because the pixels on their phone are in the shape of a nipple.

See also: NYT, Substack, Patreon.


I think OP meant that some type of content just makes more money. I'm also curious, beyond explicit adult content, I wonder how much OnlyFans is pulling in.


Check out Twitch streamers. I have personally witnessed a $5000 donation on a live stream from a variety streamer who mostly would dance, cosplay and stream gaming.


Research shows that higher order brain function shuts down when being sexually stimulated, but I understand your general point.


I don't think there's been enough time. I firmly believe that subscription fatigue will eventually hit enough people to show that model isn't sustainable for everyone. People will still have subs for some apps, but only a few.

> I suspect that the average person does not sweat every single $5 purchase they make.

I suspect people don't know just how little discretionary income for things like this the average person really has. Something like 3/4 of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: