As much as this would be excellent. I don't think a dying company will have the funds to do a full code audit and clean out everything everything have under license, under nda or under some other legal agreement and still have a functional code base at the end.
LG itself is not dying though, they are only leaving one market. If there is a situation where this might work for a classic enterprise is it this one, isn't it?
Open what? The screen? 90% of what makes the phone a phone is Qualcomm IP and there’s no planet on which they’re going to allow release of their proprietary bits.
I'd be happy with nothing more than a bootloader unlock. They don't have to give me a line of proprietary code.
It would be nice of course, but that just makes things easier.
Releasing code is merely the difference between easy and difficult.
A locked bootloader is the difference between possible and not-possible.
(I have a Sprint V20 which is not rootable. There have been brief windows of rootability in the past due to exploits and hacks, which were subsequently closed.)
The only thing I don't like is the placement of the power button. That is truly ridiculous and agrevating.
Oh and the lcd actually kinda blows. It has a weird form of burn-in that comes & goes and always shows things that were recently on the screen, not really like normal permanent burn-in that builds up over time on a crt or oled. It's a known issue with the model.
I digress but if I'm going to say why it matters to be able to root this old phone by pointing out it's unique and desirable features, I felt the pretty significant negative should be noted anywhere the positive is.
It probably more about cam drivers and such stuff that prevents a news OSes from being useful on older devices. Essentially they could make it possible for independent devs to create updates for they phones for quite some time.
So Sony's IP (who also will not open source it), because LG doesn't make a cellphone camera sensor that I'm aware of. A quick perusal of some of the most popular models shows almost entirely IMX (Sony) sensors.
LG won't listen and doesn't care. I still signed the petition because I might as well help everyone try, but let's be honest, corporations don't give a damn about their products and customers after their proeucrs disappear from the shops, let alone the environment.
It takes a lot of time and money to check code for licenses. The open source stuff they have to release is already available online anyway. The rest of the code is most likely the IP of someone else, be it Qualcom for the SoC or Sony for the camera blobs.
It'd be nice if LG would open up their special sauce, if they do then I'll definitely consider their products first next time I need to replace something in my home.
I don't see this happening tho. Sadly, there are closed source components in the products which are under NDA's, and even if the company wanted they wouldn't be able to open source some stuff.
I don't expect LG to open something that doesn't belong to them and I'm pretty sure that no matter what some drivers will remain closed source. That's fine. But still a HUGE help will be releasing schematics, GPIO usage, kernel configuration files and so on... You don't need everything open sourced to keep maintaining support.
Would be happy to see a support from open source community for LG phones long after the manufacture is closed. LineageOS for example does a good job supporting old phones. Reverse engineering takes ages and very often is abandoned somewhere in the middle of months or years of work. So it would be very nice if LG didn't push open source community to have to do reverse engineering.
Another thing is that they didn't manage to sell their mobile division so it means all their work is gonna go to waste. And that would be very pity. I would be happy to see them donating everything to organizations like Pine64 (or some other org - pine64 is just first that comes to my mind).
Most of the problematic parts that make it difficult to support into the future are from third parties like the chipset maker and the camera sensor maker etc.
OEMs don't really have what you'd need to make the phone "open", even assuming that they were legally able to.
Except they run on Android not some proprietary OS. Buying out Samsungs mobile wing might achieve this if you go for their custom OS, but Microsoft is the last company that needs to buy anybody out for an OS. I kinda hope somebody does buy out LG's mobile division though.
LG has been already caught spying viewers through their Smart TVs [0]; if that's common practice, I wouldn't expect them to open source their phones or anything else. Signed the petition anyway because I always support those efforts, but won't hold my breath on it.
This would be great, my LG V20 is collecting dust in my desk besides my shiny and updated Note 10 Plus. But as LG decided to fuck up their customers, I'm pretty sure they won't care now...
