The use in the case you are referring to had several extra elements which prompted the court to not find copyright infringement.
2 Live Crew was fair use because their work was transformative. They took a beat and changed words to a Roy Orbison song. They did not blindy copy, as the question asker will be doing. They took the score, not the words.
The poster is taking the story, not quotes. His site is not transformative, and therefore his commercial use is not fair
"While commercial copying for profit work may make it harder to qualify as fair use, it does not make it impossible."
see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use