Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The problem is that "evidence" is pretty easy to find. Even the wildest conspiracy theories has pages and pages of links to their evidence.

Who should evaluate the evidence for its credibility?



Is that a serious question? Here's a better one:

Who has the right to tell others what they may, and may not, decide for themselves?


> Who should evaluate the evidence for its credibility?

Why the Ministry of Truth of course


I don’t have an answer to that but it most certainly should NOT be New York Times, Business Insider, WAPO, FactCheckXYZ, etc style publications.


Wait. You've just excluded a bunch of stuff without even hinting what you're in favour of. For all we know, you might think it should be Alex Jones.

Don't do this. It's hand-waving and people can read all kinds of things into it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: