Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> No, it was not the correct call, because it means that possibility was not investigated when it should have been.

Wuhan is in China, and the government there is relatively unfazed by social media excitement in other countries. It would not have changed a thing.

In early 2020, literally the only thing the story had going for it was that it was more exciting than the alternative, and that it made China look bad. That absolutely is the kind of story you ignore. I'm sure you remember those were heady times, and there was a lot of bullshit to sift through. Some of that bullshit we still have to deal with today.

Based on what we know now, we shouldn't discount the possibility of some involvment of the lab, but that is absolutely not the same thing as believing that it was responsible, or even that the virus was made in some research programme.

I really wish we would see a little bit more of the cool professionalism that you often see in air crash investigations, where everybody understands that assigning blame before the facts are known is quite likely to make you look like a fool later on, and will hurt people for no reason.



How about exonerating the lab before the facts were in, was that OK or not?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: