Wrong again, a psychologist would not make that mistake. They know what those words mean; you just googled them. Luckily you didn't even try explain away dysthymia from your armchair because, well, you have nothing to stand on.
> Many psychiatrists, by virtue of their education, are part of a class of people who are themselves more prone to depression and anxiety
The fact that we trust those more prone to depression to solve depression should not be discounted.
When it comes to 'dysthymia'. The only reason we find it to be a disease is that we expect people to be happy all the time. We've labeled anything other than that as diseased. As I stated elsewhere, I do not believe in happiness. Most of my day is spent neither sad nor happy. Were I to be sad all the time, I don't think that's particularly interesting either. Our society is not set up with space for people to not be happy. Society is ill, not the people.
I've banned this account for breaking the site guidelines. Please don't create accounts to do that with; it will eventually get your main account banned as well.
It's particularly important not to be an asshole when you're arguing for a position which is actually true. Doing that discredits the truth, and that hurts everyone.
(I don't know if what you're arguing here is true, but since you seem to be sure that it is, you should be treating it more carefully.)
The parent seeks to discredit the legitimacy of all mental disease, based on a study of a handful of Mensa members from 2016. Does that "discredit the truth?"
Their original comment was flagged and removed. Sorry, who's the "asshole" again?
> Many psychiatrists, by virtue of their education, are part of a class of people who are themselves more prone to depression and anxiety
Yikes, now we're just on to blind speculation.