Sure, but again, the author is explicitly not arguing that. Look:
> They keep inventing "revolutionary new ways" of doing the same thing that could be done in a dozen ways already. And they do that by coating more and more and more unnecessary complexity on top of existing technology stacks.
He's mad that the tools exist at all. He's going after the people making them, not just using them.
> They keep inventing "revolutionary new ways" of doing the same thing that could be done in a dozen ways already. And they do that by coating more and more and more unnecessary complexity on top of existing technology stacks.
He's mad that the tools exist at all. He's going after the people making them, not just using them.