Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's backed by mathematics instead of a country. That doesn't make it better or worse, just different, and diversity is generally what people want in their portfolio.


It's not backed by mathematics any more than gold is backed by chemistry.


Uh, gold _is_ backed by chemistry. If gold were to change nearly any of its chemical properties, it would instantly lose its value. It is stable, generally non-reactive, non-toxic, lustrous, and of generally low abundance - all properties derived directly from its chemistry.

That is actually one of the strongest arguments, to my mind, for why some variant of a cryptocurrency will survive as a store of value. Gold kind of "organically" found its way into value almost precisely because it is backed by the physical laws of nature. Cryptocurrencies went up a level to be backed by the laws of mathematics.


Gold's value comes from being a Schelling point, not from any particular chemical properties - other than, like, not killing you or exploding.

Bitcoin is also a Schelling point.


Sure and cash is backed by a special linen-cotton blend of paper.


So, quite a lot then?

Making gold has always been the holy grail of chemistry. It's only valuable because chemistry says you can't make it easily.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: