> kind of sucks the stack success requires Supabase to die
this is a zero-sum view of the world. I'm sure that as the stack becomes popular, Supabase will too (and vice-versa).
> when time to actually host the database comes people will move from Supabase to AWS etc.
Databases are inherently sticky - it's the reason we started with the "Jamstack" crowd rather than enterprise use-cases. If you start on Supabase, and we handle all your scaling, there should be no reason to migrate to a different cloud.
> When it comes to hosting DB AWS, Azure etc have massive advantage.
given the (in)stability of cloud providers in 2021, I think we will see a trend toward multi-cloud in the the next few years. I'm not sure that they have such a large advantage (we use AWS so it's not like they can offer superior hardware).
I'm glad you like the stack
> kind of sucks the stack success requires Supabase to die
this is a zero-sum view of the world. I'm sure that as the stack becomes popular, Supabase will too (and vice-versa).
> when time to actually host the database comes people will move from Supabase to AWS etc.
Databases are inherently sticky - it's the reason we started with the "Jamstack" crowd rather than enterprise use-cases. If you start on Supabase, and we handle all your scaling, there should be no reason to migrate to a different cloud.
> When it comes to hosting DB AWS, Azure etc have massive advantage.
given the (in)stability of cloud providers in 2021, I think we will see a trend toward multi-cloud in the the next few years. I'm not sure that they have such a large advantage (we use AWS so it's not like they can offer superior hardware).