I guess the original article didn't take misleading statements into account. Bec... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		koonsolo on April 10, 2022 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Heresy I guess the original article didn't take misleading statements into account. Because your statement might indeed be factually true, but very misleading. What about "Can a statement be x-ist, for whatever value of x, and also true, when the statement is clear in its intentions and not misleading?". Would you agree with that?

happytoexplain on April 10, 2022 [–]

An excellent point - see my reply to the parent about "13/52" for my personal opinion.

Edit: Note that my post implies that racial hatred/propaganda is a subset of racism, which you may or may not agree with semantically.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact