Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Those chopped-up pieces of crap got lumped together in big collections which got rated AAA, because the people rating them assumed that not too many of the little pieces would fail at the same time.


I think GP covered that with:

> though some were fraudulently marketed as such


I don't think what I described was entirely fraud. I think people honestly underestimated how correlated the failures could become.

(But I won't deny that there was also fraud, and economic incentives for inflated ratings.)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: