Correct. But it is evidence someone doesn’t want to talk about this.
That might mean anything from complicity to ignorance to not wanting more workplace drama. In every case, it gives merit to Googlers claiming caste discrimination needs an independent investigation. (Versus relying on the company’s processes.)
> Where is their concern for other violence that is more prevalent?
Isn't this just straightforward whataboutism? If every person that is advocating against a problem in society has to advocate against every problem in society they will never get anything accomplished because there is always another injustice.
Not only is it just straightforward whataboutism, it's also implying, we as a society, can only work on one problem at a time. If we're tackling caste discrimination, we can't also be working to reduce violence. This is an either/or logical fallacy.
