Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This way of looking at it might justify the statistic, but at the cost of making it uninteresting.


Interesting enough to me, and pretty relevant to a claim like "book-writing is rarely commercially worthwhile". No "points scored" against the publishing industry, but point-scoring is for shallow people.

For publishing, I wonder how many copies of little-bought books are read, and how many are printed -- both probably quite different to the number sold. And I also wonder how the outcome distribution compares to venture capital outcomes, and what predictor variables are useful. "Harry Potter" is a famous case of prediction being difficult (or at least badly done?) but you can probably get some signal from author (writing history, other celebrity), genre.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: