Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> How do you know?

You're right, I don't know for sure. But I have a feeling they'd be eager to escape the 30% cut of transactions. [0] Not to mention bypassing the rules around user tracking.

> Third off, stopping businesses from making anticonsumer decisions isn't an argument against abolishing anticonsumer practices.

I don't fully follow, what do you mean by this?

> We wouldn't be in this situation in the first place if Apple didn't unfairly use their position of power to impose a tax on all payment processing that happens on their operating system.

That I agree with. 30% is steep and feels excessive. But I'm just arguing as an end user I value the peace of mind that I can install any app from their App Store with a reasonable amount of confidence. It's not perfect and things do slip through the cracks, but it's better than nothing.

0: https://businessinsider.mx/meta-accuses-apple-undercutting-b...



> 30% is steep and feels excessive.

Almost everybody pays 15%, not 30%.

If you make less than a million dollars a year through the App Store, you pay 15%. This covers almost everybody.

If you are earning over a million dollars a year, but you are selling subscriptions, then you pay 15% for all the subscriptions that have been in place for longer than a year.

The only people who are paying 30% are the people making a lot of money through the App Store from something other than long-term subscriptions.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: