For example, say, the people involved got four weeks to do this -- and they were done in a day, but then continued adding more and more words anyway to fill the time. Or because more words would give a more serious / competent impression.
I'd like to assume good intentions or incompetence / laziness / selfishness & don't-care, rather than giant conspiracy theories
Don't we have the same problem with in house lawyers and designers, who, if idle, want to sue someone, or want to redesign a "perfect" app and just make it worse
Or software devs who add pointless stuff to the tech stack
Maybe Parkinsons law should be amended:
> "work expands to fill the time allotted for its completion [with pointless things you'd be better off without]"
For example, say, the people involved got four weeks to do this -- and they were done in a day, but then continued adding more and more words anyway to fill the time. Or because more words would give a more serious / competent impression.
I'd like to assume good intentions or incompetence / laziness / selfishness & don't-care, rather than giant conspiracy theories
Don't we have the same problem with in house lawyers and designers, who, if idle, want to sue someone, or want to redesign a "perfect" app and just make it worse
Or software devs who add pointless stuff to the tech stack
Maybe Parkinsons law should be amended:
> "work expands to fill the time allotted for its completion [with pointless things you'd be better off without]"