For me limitations are killing 90% of usecases. In absence of |> % syntax I'd ne... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

scotty79 on Jan 20, 2023 | parent | context | favorite | on: Pipe Operator (|>) For JavaScript

For me limitations are killing 90% of usecases.

In absence of |> % syntax I'd nearly always would go with intermediate temporary variables instead of pipe(). "point-free" syntax feels horrible for me and wrapping everything in lambdas feels excessive.

disantlor on Jan 20, 2023 [–]

I use Ramda pipe() all the time and use a descriptively-named intermediate/temp variables wherever I might want to write a comment

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact