Yes, that's how most people use MS Teams. It's extremely useful. The sharing space for documents is good. Collaborative editing in Office is good. Conferencing is good. Presenting from Powerpoint is good.
It's the same thing in every discussion involving Teams: most HN readers don't realise just how unusual the tools they use and what they want are with regards to the average job.
> most HN readers don't realise just how unusual the tools they use and what they want are with regards to the average job.
Probably because it literally doesn't matter what experience other have. The only thing that matters to me about a tool is if it's helping or hurting.
Teams does both, which I consider damning because there are other tools available that are much lighter on the "hurting" side.
But companies don't actually seem to care about things like that. They see that they are getting Teams "for free", and so that's what we're forced to use.
It's the same thing in every discussion involving Teams: most HN readers don't realise just how unusual the tools they use and what they want are with regards to the average job.