Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I’m surprised to see it that low. Downtown SF is pretty dead. As an introvert looking for some quiet time I head into the office with an open floor plan to not see people while I work.


A 100-person office that has one introvert coming into it every day because they are looking for some quiet time is not considered 'vacant' by this statistic.


I don't even think it would track it if 0 people were coming in, as long as the lease is still active. Commercial office leases tend to be on the longer end compared to residential (eg. 10-year is not uncommon).


So the per-desk vacancy, if such a thing were tracked, might be much higher than 33%?


https://www.kastle.com/safety-wellness/getting-america-back-...

Those statistics are probably closer to what you want.


Right. 49% pre-pandemic occupancy, measured by the systems that check people in when they enter the building.


43.2% specifically for San Francisco metro last week.

I find the reports interesting and they change through time and for example the breakdown by day of the week.


The proper way to track it would be traffic in the commute hours and spending on lunches and so on during the work day, I suppose? Isn't that what cities are measuring and looking at with this return to office stuff?


Correct. Those lower-desk-utilization offices still have current leases.


>I’m surprised to see it that low. Downtown SF is pretty dead.

And yet there are people in denial. This /r/sanfrancisco post is unintentionally hilarious. <https://np.reddit.com/r/sanfrancisco/comments/11z2cz5/americ...> I think they think that "People leaving SF" = "Trump wins", or something.


>As an introvert looking for some quiet time I head into the office with an open floor plan to not see people

...maybe they see you coming?


How thoughtful of then to clear out for him!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: