it doesn’t and that wasn't the premise of why we can acknowledge that using that payment network saved everyone time in the clawbacks, despite the shaken confidence that the exact same event caused into that payment network
the main distinction involved here is that not knowing who to subpeona for records slows down everything, whereas with the blockchains used most of the participants consolidate funds into KYC’d exchanges and we know which ones they went to, speeding up requests for records and subsequent action
In other words, blockchains make it easier to track what we are doing with our money, without the justice system being involved, and that’s somehow good.
I actually think Madoff is a great example of comparison, and didn't mention that because I felt someone else would call that a strawman, ironically, or at least choose to say something about the difference in the size of those frauds.
The main difference is the time, you're choosing to ignore that. 8 months versus .... how many years for Madoff? A decade?
>But the biggest sum has been in “category A crypto” tokens with large and liquid markets. FTX now has more than $4bn of crypto assets under its control, a total that has been bolstered by a sharp recovery in cryptocurrency prices.
>Bitcoin, which had dropped below $20,000 after FTX’s collapse, this week broke $30,000 for the first time since June 2022 , with other cryptocurrencies including ethereum charting a similar course.
This seems to go against your claims. - the existing assets just became more valuable in USD terms. Actual recoveries:
>Recovery efforts have more than doubled that figure so far, court filings show, including $800m in recovered cash and a further $600m in “settlements and investments receivable”.
You know, the core differentiating feature of cryptocurrency.