> ie India can demand that any *.in domain has to follow Indian law and take...

		anamax on March 6, 2012 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Uncle Sam: If It Ends in .Com, It’s .Seizable > ie India can demand that any .in domain has to follow Indian law and take down any posts that disparage its leaders, etc.. Why is it unreasonable for a .in domain to follow Indian law? Isn't that the whole point of country-specific domains?

Who decided that .com is for everyone? (serious question)