Me too. The biggest issue is size. Fonts are cut to be typeset at certain sizes.
Kerning depends on size. The smaller the font is displayed, the more it likely it is used for text were uniform looking kerning depends more on the upper third of a character.
However, this page displays the fonts large, very large, depending on what display you look at it.
So this has to be taken into account for the 'solution'. And furthermore, since the display is large, like a headline or logo, the kerning should consider the whole character, not just the upper part.
Lastly that font size may we'll be against the intend of the typographer who cut the resp. font.
I.e. if the font's internal kerning is used, that would then become an unreliable measure for 'correctness'.
Kerning depends on size. The smaller the font is displayed, the more it likely it is used for text were uniform looking kerning depends more on the upper third of a character.
However, this page displays the fonts large, very large, depending on what display you look at it.
So this has to be taken into account for the 'solution'. And furthermore, since the display is large, like a headline or logo, the kerning should consider the whole character, not just the upper part.
Lastly that font size may we'll be against the intend of the typographer who cut the resp. font.
I.e. if the font's internal kerning is used, that would then become an unreliable measure for 'correctness'.