Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'd like to add that if this claim of having replicated the material with the reportedly poor description of how to do so is true then it really isn't that hard to replicate. I am surprised they haven't published a paper by now.

And this suggests that they were conflicted for some reason about publishing, likely commercially so (as evidenced about the patent). Maybe they were trying to create a product with it that they could sell before others could replicate the material.

So the rogue employee does absolutely deserve credit for bringing this thing into the world and humanity should not stigmatize them for doing so; perhaps we should do exactly the opposite.



>reportedly poor description of how to do so

Isn't it false?

I have read that the description is pretty extensive, just the yelds are really bad because the production method is 1) hard and 2) inconsistent?

So the description is good but hard to replicate


> and humanity should not stigmatize them for doing so

If he really did it for all mankind then give him a huge prize




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: