> The large fee compensates local residents in the form of reduced city taxes over time.
I wish lowering the taxes by compensating with other means was a more common approach. The most usual approach is accumulating income in whatever way possible.
Isn't this in part because so many cities need all the cash they can get to fund individually-insolvent infrastructure? [0] If the goal is to be able to maintain roads that can't pay for themselves by enabling revenue generation, then I can absolutely see why cities would need to accumulate income in whatever way possible.
I wish lowering the taxes by compensating with other means was a more common approach. The most usual approach is accumulating income in whatever way possible.