Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

He didn't call him that at all. He said him being unwilling to explain his points and instead just making claims comes across that way.

He at no time called him biased or said he was directly acting in bad faith



> Biased. And not arguing in good faith. :(


You are leaving the prior part of his sentence out. Regardless, Before he said that you weren't willing to answer either.


You are both gaslighting.

As I plainly explained, right at the top, it is not theoretical. There is no point engaging people with evidence if they are so dismissive of basic facts.

But then that is also true here. Your claims about him not saying what he plainly did are just bizarre.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: