Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Omegle didn't intentionally put people on a collision course with abusers either. If Omegle was intentionally facilitating abuse as you put it, then so is IRC and effectively any other public communications mechanism: because anyone could be an abuser.

Even just preventing 1% of abuse would probably have been beyond the capabilities of this site. You write that they should flag adult men listing interest in topics associated with children. How are they supposed to identify the gender and age of users? People under 18 are prohibited from the site, yet that clearly failed. Human moderation can't even monitor a fraction of one percent The "many obvious" ways of preventing abuse were in fact attempted [1]:

> Omegle implemented a "monitored" video chat, to monitor misbehavior and protect people under the age of 18 from potentially harmful content, including nudity or sexual content. However, the monitoring is not very effective, and users can often skirt around bans.

Sure, Omegle "randomly put you into head on collision situations with others", but so is every other public communications: IRC, discord, Xbox Live, pretty much anywhere you can meet random people on the Internet fits into this category.

1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omegle



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: