How is it clear that I don't understand those frameworks when I haven't said a word about them? I've commented exclusively on HTMX and its use cases, you're the only one making comparisons.
You have very poor reading comprehension. I never claimed HTMX was "the best." But yes, HTMX is a fantastic tool (and language agnostic), and the existence of other frameworks does not diminish its utility. If your only argument is to compare it to 30-year old Access/Jet, you're simply exposing your own lack of credibility and inherent irrelevance.
Serious question: are you wickedly combative in all discussions, or just when you get the cold feeling that perhaps you might not know as much as you think you do?
If you look through the progressive responses you've given, you resort less to actual technical points and more to personal attacks. It's weird.
When you stop rage replying and take an honest look at how LiveView or StimulusReflex work - for you actually can build the next Figma with them - you'll see that the comparison between Access and a modern database is pretty apt.
I'm specifically talking about a dramatically higher ceiling of possibility in terms of the problems that you can solve.
If you'd rather exhaust yourself trying to make personal attacks than level up your current local maximum perspective, there's really nothing else I can tell you.
Oh jeez, quit with the self-righteousness, each of your comments contains some passive-aggressive dig (HTMX = Access, HTMX is for "a landing page", I need "illumination"). You haven't stated a single "actual technical point" either. Let it go.
