It's not, and maybe my comment was unclear. My comment was about the Ghost managed hosting service and its competitors. It's just a little strange that Substack is blamed for allowing medical misinformation on a thread praising its competitor, when that competitor also allows medical misinformation.
All I'm saying is that when judging the policies of these companies, we should apply a consistent standard.
There is a consistant standard from Molly and others who have left (like Casey Newton) It has to do with social tools. Substack puts out a weekly email digest and has a notes platform where your articles can be next to the nazi articles by substacks algo. Ghost doesnt push social and isnt interested in getting into that space.
