Im thinking Libitarianism is perhaps more into "individual freedoms" than conservatism, but there's certainly overlap.
If I had to put a fence around it, I'd suggest the root of conservatism is more "govt working in the interests of the rich/aristocracy/establishment." The "people in power before there was a vote".
Charitably described as "keep things the way they are", or less charitably as "return to when our group had riches and power".
So "labor" is getting govt to work for the masses, "conservative" us getting govt to work for those already established, and libitarianism is scaling govt back, and letting people do whatever they like.
Political parties try and be all things to all men.
In some countries (where there are more than two parties) there's more likely to be different parties to cover these bases.
If I had to put a fence around it, I'd suggest the root of conservatism is more "govt working in the interests of the rich/aristocracy/establishment." The "people in power before there was a vote".
Charitably described as "keep things the way they are", or less charitably as "return to when our group had riches and power".
So "labor" is getting govt to work for the masses, "conservative" us getting govt to work for those already established, and libitarianism is scaling govt back, and letting people do whatever they like.
Political parties try and be all things to all men.
In some countries (where there are more than two parties) there's more likely to be different parties to cover these bases.